Repent About Repentance Part 1 – God’s Repentance
In today’s post I want you to repent about repentance.
This is probably my greatest concern with the doctrine of evangelical and reformed churches today. Nearly every church I have attended in the past several years defines repentance as “a turn from sin” or “a turn from sin and turn to God,” or something along those lines. They are very dogmatic about their position, but I find that their research is lacking.
I was leading an Athletes in Action meeting the other day at Eastern Oregon University. We were talking about the need for sinners to trust in Jesus Christ’s finished work in order to obtain eternal life. One of the students interjected, “What about repentance?” She then explained that if all anyone had to do to receive eternal life was to accept it as a gift from Jesus, then some really bad people could get into heaven. But repentance, she explained, meant that people would have to change the course or direction of their life if they expected to be saved…right?
Indeed, what about repentance? In creating an outline for our study on repentance, I always like to use the point that has the greatest shock factor, one that might unsettle someone a little bit and cause him to think differently, especially in the case of something like repentance where ideas about its meaning have become so ingrained. In the case of how we define biblical repentance, I like to lead with the fact that God repents in the Old Testament.
That’s right, God repents in the Greek Old Testament – the Septuagint. The Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew; however, a Greek version, now commonly known as the Septuagint, was written around 250 B.C. The Greek word μετανοέω, transliterated as metanoeo, and translated to English as “repent” is used to describe something God did. This is the same Greek word which is translated as “repent” in the New Testament.
Jonah 3:9-10 is perhaps the best example of God’s repentance.
“Who knows, God may turn and relent (metanoeo), and withdraw His burning anger so that we shall not perish. When God saw their deeds, that they turned from their wicked way, then God relented (metanoeo) concerning the calamity which He had declared He would bring upon them. And He did not do it. ” – Jonah 3:9-10, NASB
Obviously the translators felt comfortable using the word repent for something God did. It is highly unlikely that the translators thought it was possible for God to sin; therefore, it is likely that the meaning of metaneo carried a similar meaning as what is suggested by an etymological study of Greek, rather than always having something to do with leaving behind one’s sin, as our contemporary definition implies. In this example, God repents based on new information, the new information being the actions of the Ninevites.
Other occurrences where God repents or is suggested to repent include 1 Samuel 15:29, Jeremiah 4:28, 18:8, 18:10, Joel 2:13, 14, Amos 7:3, Jonah 4:2, Zechariah 8:14
Many of these occurrences of God repenting were carried over in the KJV and ASV, but were changed to other terms like “changed His mind” or “relented” in modern English translations. From 1611 when the KJV was written up until the 1960s when these English versions went out of vogue, English readers would have applied a different meaning to the words “repent” and “repentance.” A couple examples will bear this out.
Jonah 3:9-10
“Who knoweth whether God will not turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not? And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil which he said he would do unto them; and he did it not.” (Jonah 3:9-10, ASV)
“Who knows? God may turn and relent and turn from his fierce anger, so that we may not perish.” When God saw what they did, how they turned from their evil way, God relented of the disaster that he had said he would do to them, and he did not do it.” (Jonah 3:9-10, ESV).
Amos 7:3
“The Lord repented for this: it shall not be, saith the Lord.” (Amos 7:3, KJV)
“Jehovah repented concerning this: It shall not be, saith Jehovah.” (Amos 7:3, ASV)
“The LORD relented concerning this: “It shall not be,” said the LORD. (Amos 7:3, ESV)
“So the LORD relented. ‘This will not happen,” the LORD said.’ (Amos 7-3, NIV)
Jeremiah 18:8-10
“…If that nation, concerning which I have spoken, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them. And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it; if they do that which is evil in my sight, that they obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them.” (Jeremiah 18:8-10, ASV)
“If I announce that a certain nation or kingdom is to be uprooted, torn down, and destroyed, but then that nation renounces its evil ways, I will not destroy it as I had planned. And if I announce that I will plant and build up a certain nation or kingdom, but then that nation turns to evil and refuses to obey me, I will not bless it as I said I would.” (Jeremiah 18:8-10, NLT)
What is the conclusion based on this study? This is no iron-clad argument that repentance should take on a different meaning in the New Testament than the one we traditionally ascribe. It’s possible that the term changed from the period when the Septuagint was written to the period when the New Testament was written. It really all depends on what the New Testament writers meant when they used the word, and how a first century recipient would have understood it. However, I’d like the reader to begin to consider that biblical repentance carries a different definition than is commonly thought, and this is just one step in building the case.
So what have you heard is the definition of repentance? Here are several versions I have heard over the years:
- A turn from sin (and turn to Jesus)
- Admitting you are a sinner
- A change of heart
- A change of life
- A sorrow for sin
- A commitment to turn from sin
- Turning from your ways to God’s ways
- A change of mind
- Any combination of the above
Please comment below…
Interested in learning more about biblical repentance? Check out the other articles in this series:
Part I – God’s Repentance. << You are here.
Part II – Repentance in the Writings of Josephus
Part III – What Does Repent Mean in Greek? Examining Bible Dictionaries and Lexicons
Part IV – The Relationship Between Repentance and Ignorance
Repent of sin is what the world teaches. It is of the world and a false gospel. At Expreacherman, is a grace oasis where all cringe at the notion. I changed my mind about the matter last year. Thanks be to God that you reject this false teaching.
Catholicism, calvinism and lordship salvation are doctrines of devils that go along with turn from sin. In fact, turn from sin is lordship in a nutshell.
The gospel is simple, and nothing can be added to the blood of Jesus. Very few get it.
Grace out
Repentance – Go back to the point of departure; when the Lord grants you the Grace to do so submit to the Lord. Revelation 2:20-22
WD’s comment above doesn’t add a ton of value to the post but I decided to publish anyway.
Because this article is about the occurrences where God repents, if the word means, “Go back to the point of departure,” then WD needs to explain how God needs to go back to the point of departure. What does God depart from that he needs to go back to?
Related to this, in Numbers 23 we find the statement: “God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a Son of Man, that He should repent” (Numbers 23:19 – NASB). It is clear that in this passage Balak is trying to get God to change his mind in this passage from His earlier pronouncement of blessing upon Israel. He is not trying to convince God to sin. Therefore, the historical-grammatical definition of repent being a change of mind is applicable here. Indeed, other Bible versions translate this verse as:
“God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind” (NIV).
“God is not a man who lies, or a son of man who changes His mind” (HCSB).
So how is it possible that God both repents in the Old testament, and here we see the statement that he does not need to repent?
Context! It all depends on the type of change of mind/repentance.
God does repent in response to human events in time, such as the case with the men of Ninevah in Jonah.
God does not repent so as to lie or go back on his promises, as the context of Numbers 23 clearly points out.
So this is what our savior (Jesus) said, repent and believe the gospel.
So now let’s determine what the gospel is. The gospel of our Salvation is the (1Corinthians 15:1-4)
We are to change our mind from unbelief to belief, in Jesus Christ for salvation, that we cannot save ourselves, we are sinners, deserving of Hell.
But God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever Shall Believe in him will not perish but have eternal life.
We cannot do anything to save ourselves in Jesus’s very name represents salvation the Lord God Almighty is a the (God of salvation) we are to trust in Jesus not focus on what we do I’m not protecting sin but how can we ever display the fruits of the spirit if we’re constantly focusing on our self.
He said it is finished
Hi Richard, your comments are on point in the main and your overall interpretation seems sound to me. You are spot on that we cannot produce the fruit of the Spirit if we are constantly self-focused with how much life change has been produced. Some would claim we have to examine ourselves constantly to know we are truly saved, but this is antithetical to placing our entire confidence and trust in the finished work of Christ. We are instructed to build our Christian lives off the knowledge that we are saved, forgiven, and accepted by God – this sure hope forms the foundation for producing the fruit of the Spirit down the line.
You did miss that Jesus’ initial message to “repent and believe the gospel” was in regards to the Messiah as well as the millenial kingdom being offered to the nation Israel, as opposed to the gospel as we understand it now from 1 Corinthians 15.
A careful examination of the record of the gospels will show that the disciples were sent out to preach the gospel (Matthew 10, Luke 9) early in Jesus’ public ministry, but later on it is revealed they had no knowledge that Jesus would die and rise again (Luke 18:31-34). We were told that they were to go “only to the lost sheep of the House of Israel,” as this was the only group of people the kingdom was being offered to. It is only later on in Acts 2 and later that Peter and the disciples begin to understand and communicate the gospel as we understand it today.
Another point that would buttress your argument is where Paul explains the ministry of John the Baptist. Acts 19:4 – Paul said, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in Him who was coming after him, that is, in Jesus.” The primary result of the repentance declared by both John the Baptist and Jesus was to be belief in Jesus as Messiah.